Sunil Jena
Editor-in-Chief, The Politics Odia
Bhubaneswar: The suspension of Aravind Mohapatra, son of senior leader Bijoy Mohapatra, from the Biju Janata Dal has reopened an important question in Odisha politics: Does strict organisational discipline always translate into political advantage?
From the party’s perspective, the move reflects a long-standing principle: no individual is bigger than the organisation. Under the leadership of Naveen Patnaik, BJD has repeatedly signalled zero tolerance towards actions perceived as indiscipline or deviation from party line.
However, politics is not only about internal control, but it is also about public perception and electoral arithmetic.
Patkura, a politically sensitive constituency, has traditionally been influenced by the Mohapatra family’s presence. Aravind Mohapatra’s suspension, therefore, carries consequences beyond party files and official notices. It affects local cadre morale, voter sentiment, and the broader narrative surrounding leadership inclusivity within the party.
Critics argue that the decision risks alienating a section of grassroots supporters who view the suspension as excessive. Supporters, on the other hand, believe it strengthens BJD’s institutional authority and sends a clear message ahead of future electoral battles.
The key question remains: could alternative political management, such as dialogue, warning, or internal correction, have achieved the same objective without public fallout?
History shows that Naveen Patnaik’s leadership style prioritises long-term organisational stability over short-term political noise. Yet, every decision carries a cost. Whether this move consolidates the BJD’s discipline or creates a new political challenge will depend on how effectively the party manages Patkura’s political realities on the ground in the coming months.
In Odisha politics, silence often speaks louder than slogans, and this episode is no exception.
